Scientific Conference to Assess Global Warming

Scientists, hailing from 30 countries, will give a state-of-play about knowledge and try to define what is a dangerous level of global warming.

Published: 31-Jan-2005

lass=wallacepara>World experts are expected to come to a depressing conclusion when they gather next week for the biggest scientific assessment in four years of Earth's global warming crisis.

New evidence put forward by leading scientists will add pieces to a mosaic of evidence, which suggests the climate crunch is speeding up.

The evidence also suggests that global warming will have a harsher outcome than previously thought.

The three-day conference, which will be held in the south-western English city of Exeter, is bound to have a wide political impact.

It will add the objective weight of science to the political pressures on the United States to help curb carbon pollution.

It comes just before the UN's Kyoto Protocol - the greenhouse-gas treaty fiercely opposed by President George W Bush - is due to take effect on February 16.

No advice

The scientists, hailing from 30 countries, will give a state-of-play about knowledge and try to define what is a dangerous level of global warming.

However, conference chairman Dennis Tirpak says they will not offer advice to policymakers on how to combat it.

"The next 25 years are quite critical as to what will happen over the next century," he said.

"The conference will try to collect the best evidence it can."

The last big scientific review of the evidence was in 2001, when the UN's Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) prepared a landmark report.

That report, which is due to be updated in 2007, crushed the last doubts among the majority of scientists that carbon gases, which are generated by the use of oil, gas and coal, are trapping solar heat and causing the Earth's surface to warm.

But the IPCC says there remains much uncertainty as to how fast this would happen, exactly how the climate system would be affected and which regions would be hit most.

It cautiously calculated that by 2100, temperatures would rise by between 1.4 C and 5.8 C compared to 1990 levels, according to whether carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere doubled or nearly quadrupled from pre-industrial levels.

The sea level would rise by between nine and 88 centimetres according to the CO2 scenario cited by the IPCC.

Certainty grows

In the past five years, the IPCC's margin of uncertainty has narrowed, eroded almost weekly by new studies that appear in Science, Nature and other prestigious journals.

"People are starting to realise that the higher end of climate-change scenarios are now possible," Chris Jones, a researcher at the British Met Office's Hadley Centre, said.

"Indeed, it's fairly accepted now, as every year goes by, that we are already seeing changes [in the climate system]."

Ticking clock

The latest studies, some of which will be submitted in Exeter, suggest the clock is ticking faster than thought.

One piece of research will suggest that just 15 years are left to ensure that atmospheric CO2 pollution will be stabilised by the end of the century at 550 parts per million (ppm), twice that of the pre-industrial age.

At present, the level is 379ppm, which seems reassuringly far from 550ppm.

But it is rising quickly as China and India, which have huge populations, gobble up fossil fuels to power their fast-growing economies and America, the biggest single polluter, maintains its rivers of gas-guzzling cars.

Even if this 550ppm target is reached, the climate system may still be wrecked, according to the latest calculations.

A study of more than 2,000 computer models suggests that 550ppm will crank up temperatures by nearly two C and more than 11 C.

In the latter part of this range, ice caps would shrink, glaciers melt and droughts, floods, El Ninos and hurricanes could become commonplace.


2006 Bugatti Veyron 16.4 is powered by an 8-liter, 16-cylinder engine that produces some 1,000 horsepower and 950 foot-pounds of torque, delivering 0-188 mph in 14 seconds.


blog comments powered by Disqus