Not All Sustainable Transportation Subsidies Should Be Created Equal
When it comes to pumping up the appeal of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), some regions are more ripe for the cars than others, and some consumers' buttons need more pushing than others -- an important policy distinction when shaping subsidies, two energy policy experts say.
In a recent article in Energy Policy, a leading academic journal in the energy field, Steven Skerlos in mechanical engineering at the University of Michigan and James Winebrake, chair of the Department of Science, Technology and Society/Public Policy at Rochester Institute of Technology, and make the case for a better way to target government subsidies aimed at promoting sustainable transportation technologies.
It turns out that giving consumers who live and drive in regions where the social benefits of electric-boosted cars are strongest, and recognizing the circumstances of consumers -- such as their income, life stage and family size -- gives PHEVs a better shot at both sales and environmental and energy security effectiveness.
|<< PREVIOUS||NEXT >>|
Why wait? You can create your own plug-in hybrid.
Chrysler aims to have four electric vehicles in the market by 2013.
Fisker's Q-Drive provides 50 miles of 'stealth mode', electric driving range before shifting to hybrid mode.
blog comments powered by Disqus