In a revolutionary leap that could transform solar power from a marginal, boutique alternative into a mainstream energy source, MIT researchers have overcome a major barrier to large-scale solar power: storing energy for use when the sun doesn't shine.
Until now, solar power has been a daytime-only energy source, because storing extra solar energy for later use is prohibitively expensive and grossly inefficient. With today's announcement, MIT researchers have hit upon a simple, inexpensive, highly efficient process for storing solar energy.
Requiring nothing but abundant, non-toxic natural materials, this discovery could unlock the most potent, carbon-free energy source of all: the sun. "This is the nirvana of what we've been talking about for years," said MIT's Daniel Nocera, the Henry Dreyfus Professor of Energy at MIT and senior author of a paper describing the work in the July 31 issue of Science. "Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon."
Inspired by the photosynthesis performed by plants, Nocera and Matthew Kanan, a postdoctoral fellow in Nocera's lab, have developed an unprecedented process that will allow the sun's energy to be used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases. Later, the oxygen and hydrogen may be recombined inside a fuel cell, creating carbon-free electricity to power your house or your electric car, day or night.
The key component in Nocera and Kanan's new process is a new catalyst that produces oxygen gas from water; another catalyst produces valuable hydrogen gas. The new catalyst consists of cobalt metal, phosphate and an electrode, placed in water. When electricity -- whether from a photovoltaic cell, a wind turbine or any other source -- runs through the electrode, the cobalt and phosphate form a thin film on the electrode, and oxygen gas is produced.
Combined with another catalyst, such as platinum, that can produce hydrogen gas from water, the system can duplicate the water splitting reaction that occurs during photosynthesis.
The new catalyst works at room temperature, in neutral pH water, and it's easy to set up, Nocera said. "That's why I know this is going to work. It's so easy to implement," he said.
'Giant leap' for clean energy
Sunlight has the greatest potential of any power source to solve the world's energy problems, said Nocera. In one hour, enough sunlight strikes the Earth to provide the entire planet's energy needs for one year.
James Barber, a leader in the study of photosynthesis who was not involved in this research, called the discovery by Nocera and Kanan a "giant leap" toward generating clean, carbon-free energy on a massive scale.
"This is a major discovery with enormous implications for the future prosperity of humankind," said Barber, the Ernst Chain Professor of Biochemistry at Imperial College London. "The importance of their discovery cannot be overstated since it opens up the door for developing new technologies for energy production thus reducing our dependence for fossil fuels and addressing the global climate change problem."
'Just the beginning'
Currently available electrolyzers, which split water with electricity and are often used industrially, are not suited for artificial photosynthesis because they are very expensive and require a highly basic (non-benign) environment that has little to do with the conditions under which photosynthesis operates.
More engineering work needs to be done to integrate the new scientific discovery into existing photovoltaic systems, but Nocera said he is confident that such systems will become a reality.
"This is just the beginning," said Nocera, principal investigator for the Solar Revolution Project funded by the Chesonis Family Foundation and co-director of the Eni-MIT Solar Frontiers Center. "The scientific community is really going to run with this."
Nocera hopes that within 10 years, homeowners will be able to power their homes in daylight through photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen to power their own household fuel cell. Electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past.
The project is part of the MIT Energy Initiative, a program designed to help transform the global energy system to meet the needs of the future and to help build a bridge to that future by improving today's energy systems. MITEI Director Ernest Moniz, Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems, noted that "this discovery in the Nocera lab demonstrates that moving up the transformation of our energy supply system to one based on renewables will depend heavily on frontier basic science."
The success of the Nocera lab shows the impact of a mixture of funding sources - governments, philanthropy, and industry. This project was funded by the National Science Foundation and by the Chesonis Family Foundation, which gave MIT $10 million this spring to launch the Solar Revolution Project, with a goal to make the large scale deployment of solar energy within 10 years.
05-Aug-2008
63095
| |
The dirty carbon fueled and nuclear electric generators could all be eliminated and upgraded to this system.How simple is that!This would employ people all over the world.You could build a high-speed magnalev train with this technology,an MIT invention come full circle.The solar/H2 systems could be located in close proximity to the rails.There is no more arguement for coal or nuclear power plants.
Posted by: John Hurt
|
|
05-Aug-2008
63097
| |
Just think, 100 square miles in the desert can produce the photovoltaic electricity. Then we can pipe in water, and transmit electricity out. My PV system is about 10-15% efficient. Producing, collecting, and compressing hydrogen is not 100% efficient nor is storage. And a 'cheap' fuel cell is not 100% efficient either. It looks like battery storage is not that bad after all.
Posted by: John Spradley
|
|
05-Aug-2008
63098
| |
There is no way to judge this breakthrough without efficiency comparisons. Using electricity to make hydrogen to make electricity seems very inefficient.
Posted by: Juan Francisco
|
|
05-Aug-2008
63102
| |
"Solar power has always been a limited, far-off solution. Now we can seriously think about solar power as unlimited and soon."
"Nocera hopes that within 10 years, this will be used "
While this really does sound to be a breakthru ......it sure does not sound as if it will come to the average person SOON!!!
Posted by: Angelo Di Paolo
|
|
05-Aug-2008
63105
| |
Decentralized electricity generation is ideal but
how abundant and costly is platinum?
Posted by: John Boyd
|
|
06-Aug-2008
63112
| |
I see no reason to believe that this is going to be a cheaper way to store electricity than flow batteries, pumped hydro, molten salt thermal storage for solar thermal, compressed air systems etc that are already in use. It is unlikely to be able to compete with flow batteries. Use of electricity to produce hydrogen and oxygen gases that need to be stored and then used to produce electricity again in a fuel cell is likely to be less efficient than just producing and storing reduced electrolye in a flow battery tank. This is just another chapter in the silly hydrogen economy fairy story.
Posted by: Shane Wilson
|
|
06-Aug-2008
63108
| |
What about something as simple as using excess solar during the day to pump water into a tower, and then generate hydro power at night draining the tank.
I've heard that works pretty well as a practical solution. Anybody know the reactive efficiency?
Posted by: p m
|
|
18-Nov-2008
64935
| |
no numbers
Posted by: dody b
|
|
06-Aug-2008
63136
| |
Sounds good at first sight - but how about this:
Let's make the whole thing much smaller by storing the hydrogen in a metallic alloy like mischmetal, and the oxygen in another alloy like nickel oxyhydroxide - and land up with a totally reversible system running at about 80-85% energy recovery, its reliable and safe - it's been around for years and you can buy things using it in most stores, they're called NiMH batteries. No, oxygen hydrogen systems are a good answer, but not a brilliant one when you really look into them.
Posted by: Tony Maine
|
|
07-Aug-2008
63139
| |
It is huge. Recirculated CO2 (instead of storage) and cheap 3H2 equals CH3OH plus H2O. Methanol may replace oil to run the world. Onkel Sam chose the wrong alcohol.
Posted by: Jan-Gerhard Hemming
|
|