Boeing Volt SUGAR 154-passenger airliner concept | EV World Is Now Powered By Plug-In Conversions Corporation
                           PREMIUM LOGIN

GAIN INSIGHT INTO THE RAPIDLY EMERGING WORLD OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES. SIGN UP TODAY FOR YOUR FREE COPY OF OUR WEEKLY EMAIL NEWSLETTER.

10 Jan 2008 HEADLINE


SYNOPSIS: Essay by David Sandlow, author of Freedom from Oil.

Source: Gather.com
Class: EDITORIAL/OPINION

Are Plug-in Hybrids the Answer to Oil Dependency?

To reduce oil dependence, nothing would do more good more quickly than making cars that could connect to the electric grid.

The United States has a vast infrastructure for generating electric power. However, that infrastructure is essentially useless in cutting oil dependence, because modern cars can't connect to it. If we built cars that ran on electricity and plugged into the grid, the potential for displacing oil would be enormous.

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) are a game-changing technology. They can break our oil addiction, cut driving costs and reduce pollution. To help end U.S. oil dependence, there is no higher priority than putting millions of plug-in hybrids on the road soon.

A QUICK HISTORY OF ELECTRIC CARS
The first cars ran on electricity. In 1900, electric cars outsold all other kinds. However, early electric cars could travel no more than a few miles on a single charge. Cars with internal combustion engines, fueled by petroleum, could go much farther. During the early decades of the 20th century, petroleum-fueled cars took over the market.

For almost 90 years, electric vehicles were limited to niche applications. Golf carts and fork lifts used electric motors, but on-the-road vehicles almost never did. Then, in the early 1990s, the U.S. Congress and State of California passed clean air rules designed to spur innovation by major automakers. Several responded with new models of electric cars.
Unfortunately the electric cars of the 1990s produced more controversy than clean air. General Motors EV-1 was the most controversial. Leased mainly in California, with a range of 80-140 miles, the EV-1 won hundreds of wildly enthusiastic owners. But GM considered overall buyer interest inadequate and discontinued production. Major auto manufacturers lobbied successfully to change the California rules requiring them to build "zero emission" cars.

In the late 1990s,Toyota and Honda began marketing the first "hybrid electrics." A hybrid electric vehicle combines an internal combustion engine and electric motor. The engine runs on oil and the electric motor draws power from a battery. The battery is recharged with extra power from the engine (for example, when the car is going downhill) and energy captured from the brakes (in a process known as "regenerative braking"). When the battery is depleted, the vehicle runs on its gas tank. This solves the problem of short driving range that plagued other electric vehicles, while providing better fuel efficiency, torque and other measures of engine performance than a car with an internal combustion engine only.

Beginning in 2003, buyer interest in hybrid electric vehicles began to explode. By 2004, buyers were forced to wait months as dealers struggled to keep up with growing demand.4Worldwide, more than 1,000,000 hybrid electric vehicles have now been sold.

2. THE NEXT STEP-PLUG-IN HYBRIDS
The next big step in automotive technology is the plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV). Like conventional hybrids, PHEVs combine an electric motor and internal combustion engine. But, as the name suggests, there is an important additional feature. Plug-in hybrids can be recharged from the electric grid. They can-quite literally-be plugged into a wall socket.

The idea is simple, but the consequences are far-reaching:

With plug-in hybrids, many drivers would need no petroleum for their daily commute. Cars could be recharged at night and many drivers could travel back and forth to work or around town using the car's electric motor only.
Driving costs would drop dramatically. At national average electricity prices, PHEVs would cost the equivalent of roughly 75 cents per gallon to drive when operating on their electric motors. (When charging, a plug-in hybrid car draws roughly the same amount of electricity as a home space heater.)
As with many electric cars, torque and acceleration would be excellent.
Said one enthusiast who converted his Toyota Prius to a plug-in: "Everyone wants to drive electric cars, they just don't know it yet."

The biggest barrier to mass production is battery technology. Adding a plug-in feature to a conventional hybrid engine requires adjustments that increase the cost and size of the batteries, while shortening their expected life. Extra costs now run roughly from $8,000 to $11,000 per car. These costs are expected to drop sharply, however, with mass production and advances in battery technology. Many innovators-supported by substantial venture capital-are at work on new high-performance batteries.

In late 2006, General Motors announced plans to produce a plug-in hybrid, known as the Chevy Volt, and displayed a prototype at the Detroit Auto Show. Toyota and other manufacturers have also indicated they are looking seriously at PHEVs. The time frame for bringing these cars to market is unclear.

Plug-in hybrids are coming. Private investments and the predictable pace of innovation will help bring them to market, slowly, during the next decade. Federal policies could dramatically accelerate this pace. The balance of this memo summarizes the benefits of PHEVs and suggests polices to put millions on the road soon.

The above is an excerpt from Freedom from Oil by David Sandalow. It is a potential response to the Memo from the President.




Article Views: 1670





Reader Comments

A valid email address and confirmation is required before your comment can be posted. Comments not confirmed within 24 hours are automatically deleted.

First Name Last Name
Email Address:

[Please check your spelling. Do NOT use double quotes.
Use <P> to separate paragraphs.]

TYPE THE ABOVE CODE WORD INTO THE FORM FIELD


4 comments so far...

10-Jan-2008
59915
   I also recommend the book "Plug-in Hybrids" by "Sherry Boschert"
Posted by: Jeff M

10-Jan-2008
59916
   I agree with Honda's president about plug-in hybrids. They are not practical. In theory, they make sense. In practice, they don't. Too complex. Too expensive. A car that combines the worst of the gasoline and electric worlds.

In my mind, the way to the future is a pure series hybrid, powered by a diesel engine. You could get by with maybe 2 kWh worth of batteries, that would among other things store energy from regenerative braking. Design work I have seen suggests that you might get 100 miles per gallon from that kind of car.

Posted by: john

10-Jan-2008
59918
   Plug-in hybrids are prefect. We can actually afford as many advanced batteries as we want. A series will have to have a larger battery system which is more than some can afford. A pure EV neesds even more which adds up. The plug-in lets everyone buy what they can afford.

You can even charge off peak at night so we don't a single added power plant. If you are on a Time Of Day power plan it's 1/4 the price to charge at night.

We can also have V2G Vehicle to Grid connections and sell the stored energy back to help with the big peaks during the day.

You can also use an alternate fuel like E85 or even green hydrogen. Even Bio-diesel in a Series hybrid since die-sels don't do well with start stop. They do very well running at a contact level for a period of time to recharge the car.

Plug-in hybrid of course work great with wind power since that is intermitent and can't always be used at off peak times. Plug-ins allow intermitent wind to grow even more.

The Plug-in hybrid also lets batteries companies increase sales and that will reduce costs. We will someday have much more affordable batteries.

They also reduce pollution in cities since at slow speeds you can go a long way on electric and only run the fuel ICE when yourt out of the congested area.


Posted by: Jim stack


11-Jan-2008
59929
   This is a nice article, I just don’t understand the comment of John. If a car is a serial hybrid it can be a plug-in too; it is even more desirable since serial hybrids tend to have larger batteries. In fact, it is not so important if we have a parallel or a serial hybrid as long as it is a plug-in hybrid that can receive a large part of its energy from a wall socket. The next thing to have is renewable fuel, bioethanol or biodiesel, so that the little oil that is still needed when the engine starts can also be replaced. My own preference would go to a flex-fuel plug-in to allow for a smooth transition between oil and the mix electricity plus biofuel. For the rest, people should be able to choose by themselves how much EV autonomy they want or can afford, 20 miles, 30 miles or 100 miles. They should also be able to choose the generator type. This means bioethanol or biodiesel but also circular engine, that allow parallel configuration or direct linear piston engine that allows a higher yield in pure generation. Perhaps in the future they can also chose a direct ethanol fuel cell, the lone one that is indeed interesting but that only a few have tested up to now; or Thermo Photovoltaic generators that use IR photovoltaic to transform a fuel into electricity. Later on, the plug-in hybrids will mutate into tribrids. Those are plug-in hybrids that also snap whatever energy passes along. The sun energy through solar panels, the wind energy through a retractable wind generator, if still present, the tail pipe energy through a thermoelectric generator. Whatever happen the car of tomorrow will be of the plug-in hybrid base type as sure as today’s cars all have wheels, brakes, and seatbelts.
Posted by: Patrick Leonard

a d v e r t i s e r



Sign Up for FREE Weekly Newsletter




a d v e r t i s e r