|
|
 |
|
10 Jan 2007 HEADLINE |
|
|
SYNOPSIS: GM reports that the Volt will be superior to the deserted EV1 in a number of ways, including smaller batteries, more passenger room, faster battery charging, and higher top speeds on the highway.
Source: News Target
Class: SYNDICATED NEWS
GM Fights to Go 'Green' with Volt Concept Car
Following in the wake of heavy criticism for abandoning
the EV1 electric car, faltering auto giant General Motors Corp. has unveiled their latest offering to the clean car market, their
new "Volt" concept car.
The Chevrolet Volt was introduced on Jan. 7 at the North
American International Auto Show in Detroit, and is designed to obtain enough
power from its next-generation battery pack to run for 40 miles. According to
GM, the average American driver only travels about 40 miles a day, so the Volt can save about 500 gallons
of gasoline a year.
READ COMPLETE ARTICLE >>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: To read this News Target news story, click the READ COMPLETE ARTICLE link
above. This will launch a separate window to the original news source. To comment on this
story use the Reader's Comment form below.
Reader Comments
A valid email address and confirmation is required before your comment can be posted. Comments not confirmed within
24 hours are automatically deleted.
10 comments so far...
11-Jan-2007
44627
| |
This is a Quote from Ovonics in 1998, before the Chevron Terrorist Sponsoring Miscreants took over – a series Hybrid like the Volt (or maybe even better) built 10 years ago:
‘GM's series hybrid (using an electric motor to drive the front wheels) uses a compact micro gas turbine generator system to charge the GM Ovonic NiMH HEV battery pack while driving, which provides an effective fuel economy of nearly 100 miles per gallon (MPG) of reformulated gasoline! This is based on GM's anticipation that the series hybrid owner will plug the vehicle in overnight while parked in the garage (grid charging), leaving in the morning with the HEV batteries fully charged. Operating as an HEV only (no grid charging), the hybrid obtains 60 MPG highway and provides a 350mile driving range. When the generator is running, tailpipe emissions are one half of California's stringent ultra low emission levels (ULEV). The very high power to energy ratio GM Ovonic NiMH battery provides ample power for acceleration (zero to 60 MPH in nine seconds) and offers a zero emission, EV only, driving range of 40 miles, significantly more than other HEV battery types can provide.’
Here’s another couple quotes from the same article:
‘Mr. Robert C. Purcell, GM's executive director of Advanced Technology Vehicles (GMATV), outlined GM's strategy to lower the cost of electric vehicles. GM expects future EV costs to be competitive with conventional internal combustion engine powered vehicles. In addition to component and drivetrain cost reductions, Mr. Purcell noted that the Ovonic Family of Batteries was a key part of the overall cost reduction strategy and would occur in three phases: Phase I · GMO1 battery currently in production. Phase II · GMO2 battery enters production during the third quarter of 1998; first usage in S10 EV, followed by EV1. Phase III · GMO3 battery with higher specific energy and power will be equivalent in cost (battery pack plus electricity to recharge) to the lifecycle fuel cost for internal combustion engine powered vehicle.’
‘The GM Ovonic NiMH batteries for EVs and HEV’s will be available to other vehicle manufacturers. The battery, in various sizes, is suitable for EVs and HEV’s from bicycles and scooters to cars, trucks and buses. A robust, long life, maintenance free battery, the GM Ovonic NiMH battery is expected to last the life of the vehicle (rated at 100,000 miles in an electric car). In his remarks at the opening press conference, GM Chairman, President and CEO, Mr. John F. Smith, said, ‘No car company will be able to thrive in the 21st century if it relies solely on internal combustion engines.’
Posted by: Warren Heath
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44460
| |
"For most drivers, the Volt will use little or no gasoline," said GM chief engineer Nick Zielinski." So why should they have to lug around a heavy engine and gasoline? "Volt should be ready for production when its lithium-ion batteries are, which should be two to three years, he said." Why not the very successful NiMH battery of the RAV4-EV and EV1?
Posted by: John Spradley
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44482
| |
Hurray for GM! The Volt is the car I've been waiting on for twenty years. I plan being the first on the inevitable waiting list. I guarantee you they won't be able to build them fast enough, especially if they can keep the price at or under 20,000.
Posted by: Tim Hart
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44485
| |
Posted by: Darrin Russell
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44487
| |
The Chevy Volt is a perfect example of American ingenuity devoloped in a garage in small town America as the Apple Computer was and produced in the enourmous factories of the corporate world. I totally applaud GM's dedication and bravity for developing and eventually producting this much, much needed vehicle. Through my lifetime, GM has usually lagged behind other auto makers in design and technological advancement BUT, they have totally redeemed themselves with this Chevey Volt! I absolutely will buy one.
Posted by: Darrin Russell
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44506
| |
Prediction 1: I don't see them building this as advertised. I'm betting that the production version will be crippled, or morph into a parallel hybrid. This car is just so disruptive to their current biz model... how are the parts and repair biz's going to remain highly profitable with a car that needs so little maintenance? How are gas stations going to stay in biz with a car that uses so little fuel? I see no need to wait for better batteries, and the fact that they *are* insisting on 'perfect' batteries seems to indicate that they really don't want to make a lot of these cars. I'm calling their bluff: build it now with NiMH and provide for battery upgrades/options when available! I think they would find that a 25 mile range would be almost as good as a 40 mile range as far as yearly fuel savings go, for most drivers. Prediction 2: neighborhood gas stations would likely suffer with super high mileage cars because the land is too valuable and close-in stations wouldn't be needed. Boutiqe biofuel / java combo stations would probably pop up by freeway frontage roads or in industrial parts of towns.
Posted by: Ivor t
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44530
| |
To answer why they don't use NiMh battery technology for their batteries, ask Cobasys (comprised of ECD/OVonics [holders of all the NimH battery patents] and Chevron Oil] and why they sued Toyota/Pansonic when they wanted to go into production of a NiMh battery for PIHEV and replacement batteries for the Rav 4e. Cobasys has a stranglehold (can you say MONOPOLY) on the NiMh battery tech and has no plans on developing the technology for use in PIHEV (BEVs). You can blame GM for turning over all their battery technology to Ovonics after the 'failure' of the EV1 Yes, GM is playing the marketing game with the Volt prototype and the comments about when Lithium battery technology will be ready to use. GM, look at the battery pack from Tesla. They have 3 packs on the road with another 250 for 2007 production. Their latest test was 20,000 charge/discharge cycles (over 5 times what GM wants for their Volt battery pack requirements) and it gets 250 miles per charge (over 6 times what GM wants for the Volt). Both Tesla and Phoenix Motorcars will have a few thousand on the road by the end of 2008 GM doesn't want to pick a single lithium technology that it will have to support for the next 10 years so it has 2 competing technologies (A123/Cobasys and Johnson/SAFT) working on the solution. If GM doesn't bring something to market by the 2008 model year, then they will be surpassed by both Toyota, Honda, Cheri (chinese car company) and others that are willing to move the technology forward. GM dealers will have lots filled with overpriced low mpg SUV's and cars that still use the same ICE technology that it has since the early 1900's. This is from a 3 time GM car owner with 2 still in the driveway. My next car will be something with at least 50 mpg combined mileage. Are you listening GM to your loyal customers ? We want better MPG not cutesy styling changes.
Posted by: Bill C
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44531
| |
Here's to 3 more years of losses and declining market share!
Posted by: Wesley Leong
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44553
| |
GM must be joking! Really! Why should we believe there is any commitment here after the "tease" of the GM EV1. This car is a long long ways from being producted. Don't count on anything for 10 years, as that seems to be the way things have been going. If history is any indication, Toyota will probably beat GM to the showroom with a plug-in Hybrid. Sorry GM, but PR Hype with Concept Cars does nothing for me. Show me the "FOR SALE" sticker, and I'll show you my money.
Posted by: Tullio Falini Jr.
|
|
10-Jan-2007
44562
| |
I view the Volt as, an enticement to the battery
companies, to try harder. If the batteries were
there, someone would make an EV. How serious?,
well who knows.
Posted by: Menwith M
|
|
|
|