Energizing America

Frank Gaffney urges George Bush to run against-type for a man from the Oil Patch by charting a course for setting America free of its dependence on oil.

Published: 24-Jan-2006

One week from today, President Bush has an opportunity to make a truly historically significant State of the Union address.  He can do so by setting forth a program for energy security that will play against type for a man from the "Oil Patch," by charting a course for setting America free of its dependence on oil. The time demands such leadership, the national security requires it and the American people deserve no less.

There are a number of compelling reasons for action:  For starters, we in the United States, and the industrialized world more generally, are funding both sides in the War for the Free World.  On the one hand, since we consume far more oil than is available here at home, we are obliged to import most of what we need from abroad.  As a practical matter that means enriching with wealth transfers those who are the principal financiers of Islamofascist terror -- notably, Saudi Arabia and Iran.  And, on the other, we are paying vast sums to protect ourselves against such terror.

Secondly, we have a proven model for doing things differently.  We have diversified sources to meet many of our energy needs (for example, coal, nuclear power, hydroelectric and biomass).  Yet, our transportation sector remains reliant upon oil -- sixty percent of it imported -- for the gasoline and diesel fuel on which it runs almost exclusively.  This creates a dependency that is as unsustainable as it is strategically perilous, especially as the appetite for oil of our emerging rival, Communist China, continues to skyrocket.

By offering similar "fuel choice" for the Nation's cars, trucks, buses and aircraft, we can allow them to be powered by alternatives to oil that we can produce at home and/or purchase from governments other than those of the oil-exporting nations, governments that tend to be unstable at best and, in many cases, are trying to kill us. 

In fact, millions of Americans already drive vehicles such as the Ford Taurus, the Dodge Caravan and the Chevrolet Silverado truck that can use alcohol fuels (ethanol or methanol) to reduce dramatically, if not eliminate, their consumption of gasoline.  It costs around $100 extra to make a car that allows us to choose what fuel we want to use. Just as every car sold in America has seatbelts and airbags, from now on, they should all be flexible fuel vehicles.

Existing technology allows one other form of energy to serve as a transportation fuel: electricity.  Increasingly, American consumers are looking to hybrid vehicles to reduce their transportation operating costs.  Those costs can be reduced far more if such vehicles' batteries can be charged by the electrical grid.  In some areas of the country, electricity can be purchased off-peak (that is, when most people would recharge their cars, as they presently do their laptops and cell-phones) for the equivalent of 24 cents per gallon.  If the vehicle's engine is also flexible-fuel compatible, plug-in hybrids can get 500 miles per gallon of gasoline.

Enthusiasm for these sorts of "fuel choice" initiatives is also building on Capitol Hill, even in the absence of the sort of strong presidential leadership Mr. Bush can --and should -- provide.  Late last year, bipartisan efforts were unveiled by Senators Joe Lieberman, Sam Brownback and Jeff Sessions and Representatives Jack Kingston, Eliot Engel and Jim Saxton in the Senate and House, respectively.  A forceful endorsement of these initiatives in the State of the Union address would clear the way for their enactment without further delay, which must be avoided at all cost.

This is especially true in light of a grim prospect:  Forecasts of this season's hurricane season indicate that it may be, if anything, worse than last year's.  Clearing the way for the introduction and widespread use of alternative fuels -- including ethanol imported from Latin America and the Caribbean, where it can be produced cheaply from sugar cane to the benefit of the local economies and ours -- is one of the few things the United States can do to prepare for the disruptive effects of such storms on the Nation's predominantly Gulf Coast-based energy infrastructure.

Fortunately, President Bush has begun to signal his support for this sort of approach to energy security.  In his radio address last Saturday, he declared:  "Rising energy costs are also a concern...so we're going to continue to work to develop new technologies and alternative and renewable fuels that will make us less dependent on foreign sources of energy."

This is almost right:  In the State of the Union address, Mr. Bush should make it clear that we are going to use and adapt existing technologies, starting now with a requirement that every car sold in America be flexible fuel-compatible and with incentives for: the manufacture and purchase of hybrids and their plug-in variants, greatly increased production of alternative fuels and the necessary (modest) infrastructure modifications.  Set America free, Mr. President.

Views :1815


The forecast consumption of coal, nuclear and renewables have been increased from earlier predictions, while petroleum and natural gas consumption are lower.

The United States accounts for 2,544 MW of total installed capacity and 1,914 MW of operation, and the difference is due to a lack of steam due to over-exploitation of the Geysers field in California.

February 28,2006 address to National Governor's Ethanol Coalition.


blog comments powered by Disqus