Electric-powered Bullet Train Japan | EV World Is Now Powered By Plug-In Conversions Corporation
PREMIUM LOGIN
ADVERTISE ON EV WORLD
Reach tens of thousands of key EV industry drivers: from designers to investors and, of course, customers. CLICK TO LEARN MORE

Also check out EV WORLD MARKETSPACE.
 

EV WORLD EXCLUSIVE ARTICLE
Delorean 'time machine' from Back to the Future
It took a miniature nuclear reactor -- or a lightning bolt -- to power the fictional 'flux capacitor' that sent Dr. Brown's DeLorean time machine 'back to the future.' We'd settle for a good, reliable, affordable 30kwh battery.

In Search of the Flux Capacitor - Part 2



By Daniel Simpson

Part 2 of 3 part series


Open Access Article Originally Published: August 13, 2008

Continued from Part One

I GOT THE POWER

Jay Leno's voluminous garage suggests why. "I have a 1909 Baker Electric," boasts the coiffed comedian, who's as renowned for his car collection as his Woganesque humour. "That goes 110 miles on a single charge." What's more, it still works. "I have never done any maintenance," he insists, "other than maybe greasing the wheel hubs." To consumers reared on built-in obsolescence, to say nothing of the business plans depending on it, this can come as a shock. "You don't do anything," Leno repeats. "You plug it in, charge it and drive it. The motor is virtually maintenance-free." Apart from the Tesla, which makes similar boast about servicing, there are few cars in production or in the pipeline that can match the Baker's mileage, even if they could run it off the road. The Th!nk City, for example, due like half a dozen other mini EVs to hit U.S. tarmac by 2010, claims to get 124 miles per charge, though it would be less if you drove flat out at 60 mph.

Not much had changed in battery technology when the EV1 was launched. Its lead acid cells used 100-year-old science and although fairly effective they were heavy and far from ideal. The nickel-metal hydride (Ni-MH) replacements weren't particularly light either, but performance improved quite a bit and some Japanese cars still use something similar. Switching to lithium cells helped shrink mobile phones and the same principle delivers cars more power from less weight, although the Tesla Roadster's half-tonne bulk in the boot does have the advantage of generating more downforce, which comes in handy when navigating tight corners. The obstacle for many years was lithium's reactivity, which is why it can store so much energy. It's enough to "incinerate anybody in the car," warns Barrie Lawson of Axeon, a Dundee-based battery maker that's joined up with Allied Vehicles to launch electric taxis in London. "That's always been the great fear."

In the case of the Tesla, which has passed U.S. crash tests, there are 6,831 little cells to worry about, lined up in 11 separate sheets and grounded in a gloopy substance to keep them apart. Even if one blows it won't affect the others, the company says, so there's nothing to worry about when driving. Even if you crash, and a battery's broken up, an open circuit cuts its current instantly, says Barrie Lawson. Still, a spate of spontaneous laptop combustion spread panic among carmakers. Manufacturing safety checks have been tightened, and Toyota postponed plans to introduce new battery chemistry for the Prius. Lawson cautions against reading too much into this, stressing that the danger from electric parts dislodged in an accident would be "no worse than spilling a tank of petrol." Moreover, he says, "if someone came along today and proposed that you carry this highly inflammable stuff around just with a tank with a thin steel wall around it, they would say you were crazy."

Martin Eberhard concurs. "To me it's actually quite amazing that you can take a relatively small car, smack it into a truck at you know, 50 or 75 miles an hour and the gasoline tank doesn't just explode all over the place every time." Thankfully the same seems to be true for the Tesla, although rival carmakers still make scoffing noises about the number of volatile batteries joined together. In one sense they sort of have a point: the greater the number of cells, the harder it is to ensure that they hold a full charge without them automatically defaulting to the storage capacity of the weakest in the series, which weakens further every time you load it to below maximum. "We've got 72 cells in our battery pack," says Greg Starns, the head of software development at Frazer-Nash Research, another firm which plans to launch electric taxis in London this year. "And we're doing everything we can to make that fewer."

The problem is called equalisation and the solution a battery management system, or interface, which every EV needs to run effectively. The Tesla's was "a huge challenge", says Owen, though he claims it's no longer a concern – the car will load up from its wall-mounted three-phase charger in just three or four hours. Sceptics crunching these numbers say that it might take more than five times longer, at best, using a regular plug socket, but Tesla says an overnight charge is still doable. Nevertheless, this battery set up alone costs between $20-30,000, which is what American consumers are used to paying for a mid-range SUV. Put it in a heavier car, like Tesla's new Model S sedan (which may turn out to be a four-door hatchback if rumours are true), and performance would suffer. Even that vehicle, due in 2010, is expected to sell for somewhere above $60,000. A mass-market model at half that price is still just the stuff of Tesla fantasy, although it's talked about as next on the to do list.

"It all comes back to the battery," says Bill Reinert, of Toyota's U.S. Advanced Technology Group. "If you want to run longer and further on electric power alone, it means a bigger battery, it means charging a battery more fully and discharging it more completely. And it means provisions for cooling or ventilation in order to give the batteries longer life." That means choosing what you want and what you're willing to give up, in terms of space, weight and convenience as well as price. Glyn Owen expects batteries to go like microchips, though his EV version of Moore's law is a more conservative 10-year forecast of doubled power and halved size. "There's room for at least another doubling of capacity," agrees Martin Eberhard, who still holds a chunk of Tesla stock, if not management responsibility for talking up the company's prospects. Barrie Lawson isn't convinced. "There's nothing going to come along and make the battery half the size in the near future," he says. "There's no huge breakthroughs on the horizon that will make a big impact on the chemistry but there are many variations on the chemistry to optimise the battery performance."

It's a question of "flavours of lithium", to use Lawson's favoured phrase. Crudely simplified, batteries use lithium in its ionic form (which means stripping the atoms of an electron to make them positive). When the cell's fully charged, these ions congregate around its anode, which is usually made of graphite. During use, ions migrate within the battery to the other electrode, the cathode, and negatively charged electrons pass between the two via an external circuit that drives the motor. Electrodes are where it gets interesting.

GO TO NEXT PAGE >>


Times Article Viewed: 15223
Next >>



Reader Comments

First Name Last Name
Email Address:

[Please check your spelling. Do NOT use double quotes.
Use <P> to separate paragraphs.]

TYPE THE ABOVE CODE WORD INTO THE FORM FIELD


9 comments so far...

21-Aug-2008
63385
   You don't need (as in you must avoid) on-board batteries on electric vehicles, period! Just get a motor and feed it from an external grid, same as electric trains and trams do, and you make things so much easier for all. There is (in my view i.e) a pretty determined preoccupation with finding the best batteries this type or that to fit on vehicles, while quite frankly this couldn't be more delusionary, at the simplest terms a flawed approach viz the whole electric vehicle transportation mode, and just a few reasons why:- ANY battery's specific energy (power) ratio will most likely always be inferior to liquid fuels, resulting in inferior weight-to-weight performance, and trying to play catch up will always result in higher cost/ unnit prices. Not to mention retro-progressive range inhibition ( mentioned correctly above by a previous contributor as residual deadweight when the electric system is turned off), charge times, safety and inherent operational inpracticalities, etc,etc. The on-board primary motive battery, I daresay, will always remain the coffin nail of the electric car,as it's been the past 100 years. At it's most simplistic, Have an efficent central grid/network to supply all cars at standard voltage, plus effective power pick up mechanisms on vehicles (may not necessarily be standardised, giving due scope for individual designs) , and the rest will truly be history. Batteries and Yes,even oil, will be required but only to power the grid: the rest of us normal folks will then only be bothered by getting the power into our cars in similar fashion as we do for our households. No cumbersome overnight charging, no shifting of batteries about -except a minimal number (better still a small gas engine) on-board to drive up the short distance from house to the main-street grid). Is anyone else reasoning like this or am I alone?
Posted by: Joseph Mawejje

31-Aug-2008
63583
   It seems the big block may well be big business. I would like to see a consortium of sorts, that brings together scientists, designers, artists (yes artists...people with abstract imagination that aren't hindered by scientific constraints) marketers and whom ever else would lend to a great think tank to move forward. I personally believe we are in a renaissance. I continually read lots of solutions to our energy problem. The one thing lacking is that everyone wants to make lots of money. And the auto and oil companies don't want to be the losers to some new technology that would circumvent their interests. Understandable, but it does not seem to translate well into innovation or willingness to take risks in new directions. History is riddled with these kind of shortsighted greedy decisions.

There are no lack of ideas and technologies out there...if we somehow had the best interests of the planet and each other in mind, perhaps then we could find a better way. Better mass transit, less lazy people who might walk or ride a bike, and one car company whose sole purpose was to deliver the best possible personal transit vehicles to the public without the worry of so called public tastes and trends...just the best solution. The real energy crisis is our unwillingness to truly work together. And once we reach across the table to do so we will always have an energy crisis...EV's or not.
Posted by: Doug Cristafir


20-Aug-2008
63381
  
Posted by: Paul Gracey

14-Aug-2008
63308
   I belive you did not mention that Jay's Baker Electric only does 25 MPH. It's an NEV.
Posted by: vfx .

21-Oct-2008
64522
   Is it possible that this flux capacitor will be made? I hope so because it will be one of the energy saving tips. "Buy a flux capacitor thing to save energy"
Posted by: Karen Martinez

14-Aug-2008
63296
   I'm disappointed by some of Mr. Simpson's analysis of plug-in hybrids and his passing mention of GM's Volt, a car which contradicts two of his points. First, he says that when the gas engine is being used in a plug-in, the vehicle is hauling around the electric motors as dead weight. In the Volt, the motor is a generator to recharge the battery. The electic motor is the only way of propelling the vehicle and it is used all the time. Second, his article would leave with any unsuspecting reader the impression that no major manufacturer is taking up the challenge of producing a plug-in hybrid -- and that none really wants to. Again, GM has made the Volt its highest priority, has put it on a risky fast-track development schedule and essentially has given the development team a blank check to get it done on time. All of this is very well documented. It may be that he'll discuss the Volt in part three, but to virtually ignore it in this chapter is intellectually dishonest. And if he really is that ill-informed, then he should have completed his research before publishing.
Posted by: Frank Elliott

14-Aug-2008
63305
   I like this series. Well-written, I think, though from a point of view I don't necessarily share.

And I'm not a fan of Martin Eberhard. Here he says that he's surprised that gasoline tanks do not explode in every car crash. I would be very surprised if a gasoline tank ever exploded. Gasoline is flammable, but not explosive -- except in the movies. Picky point, maybe, but Eberhard's know-it-all manner in this and other cases annoys me.

Posted by: john

18-Aug-2008
63347
   I think that is a fair and well balanced article about EVs. I read from some ZAP owners recently, one of them said that they got 50 miles on one charge, one said it costs 2 cents or less per mile and another said that they had not noticed any perceptible difference in their electricity bills.
Posted by: N Engineer

20-Aug-2008
63369
   While gasoline does not explode, gas vapor very much does. I've seen a video of a car exploding on impact with a truck on the highway, just like in the movies. A nearly empty fuel tank is the most dangerous since it has the most vapor (except in the Prius which has a bladder to prevent vapor to almost eliminate evaporative emissions). I've seen such an explosion with my own eyes where a neighbor was using gas to start a fire to burn scrap wood.

Sadly hundreds perish every year in fuel tank fires and explosions yet it doesn't make national news the way a few battery fires did where no one was hurt.
Posted by: EV Driver



TOOLS

printer email RSS

Miles Kilometers  
MPG L/100km  
 

[More Metric Converters]






Sign Up for FREE Weekly Email

Join the Dialogue

Here are the latest discussion threads on EV World's [Legacy] Forum

A Tale of Two Trabants
Posted: 15 Nov 2009
Electric Cars and Extended-Range EVs Made Simple... Really Simple
Posted: 14 Nov 2009
Two-thirds of 500 Petroleum Geologists Support "Peak Oil Is a Concern" Proposition
Posted: 10 Nov 2009
Australian Environment Minister Meets evMe Electric Car
Posted: 09 Nov 2009
What's a Smart Grid, Anyway?
Posted: 06 Nov 2009