2006 Ford Mondeo
The Ford Mondeo, which can be ordered with a fuel efficient diesel engine, is not available in North America. The author argues that models like these were sold in the U.S. and Canada, they could help meet the objectives of this paper.

Transportation Policy In America - Part 3

Conclusion of 3-part series looks at challenges and opportunities of developing a coherent national energy policy to help end America's addiction to oil

By Kevin Hughes

Go To Part One or Part Two

The environmental challenges and opportunities
It is becoming clearer that humans are affecting the climate on our planet, specifically with the emission of green house gases (GHG), Carbon Dioxide (CO2) produced from fossil fuels is coming under particular scrutiny as a potential cause of global warming. The switch to renewable Bio-diesel outlined in this policy paper reduces net CO2 emissions from the transportation sector by some 700 million tons per year over the 13 year implementation period, and puts net CO2 production on a more sustainable trajectory in subsequent years.

The mechanical engineering challenges
Whilst at first blush the CAFÉ requirements seem very aggressive, in fact the systems are already available and being adopted in small measure to achieve the first 6-8 years of incremental improvements required. Increased adoption of hybrid and variable displacement technology has the potential to improve fuel economy in the amounts required, and development of pluggable hybrid technology could potentially meet all of the improvements required over the timeline of the policy.

Economics in the auto industry are highly geared to scale production, and from this perspective, there is a requirement for large scale design and tooling investment. This investment can be aligned with model changes over time, it is this feature which prompts the evolving escalation of CAFÉ requirements. If the model replacement cycle is on average 7-10years, and the design cycle an additional 3-4 years, work needs to commence on adopting existing proven technologies, for example adding hybrid across the range of cars and trucks etc.

To drive the massive investment required in the automotive industry, 50% of the revenue gained from the MPG related taxation should be used to fund the development and implementation of technologies to be licensed to the industry, rather than them being proprietary to a specific manufacturer.

The bio-engineering challenges
The development of a bio-diesel led economy relies heavily on the potential to improve the yield from organically grown crops. Initially using soy-bean and probably moving in the direction of algae, crops can transition towards efficient yields over time. Several research studies have seen progress on these challenges and could undoubtedly accelerate in a better funding environment, 25% of MPG related taxation would be invested in solving the bio-engineering challenges.

The scientific challenges
The scientific community has been significantly under funded in terms of basic research around the areas of energy usage efficiency, energy storage and utilization and new energy sources. This policy will fund these activities to 25% of incremental tax revenues, operating in the way that NASA did during the 1960’s to put a man on the moon, a National Energy Agency (NEA) will carry out primary research and control investment spend of third parties, then license subsequent developments to the industry.

The business challenges
There is significant re-tooling to be completed to ramp production of existing and new technologies, however given the legislative creation of demand, the business community will look to take advantage of the opportunities created.

There is bound to be significant angst in the automotive sector as the demands on it outlined in this policy take effect, however, all of the major manufacturers who sell significant volumes of cars and trucks in the US, already have mainstream technology they are distributing in high petro-taxation countries globally which are capable of meeting the demands outlined in this paper. In fact, in some cases, there are models available internationally and here from the US big 3, where the most efficient variant is not available in the US, and if it were, the model range would be significantly more efficient.

Ford Mondeo (Model not available in the US- Mid Size Sedan)

2.2 Duratorq TDCi Diesel (155 PS), Durashift 6-speed manual (EEC Stage IV) Zetec, Ghia,Ghia X, Titanium, Titanium X, ST TDCi 161 8.2
(34.5 mpg)
(57.7 mpg)
(46.3 mpg)
136 8.9 12.9

Vauxhall Vectra (General Motors, Model Not available in the US – Mid Size Sedan)

Performance, fuel economy and emissions
  Performance (mfg figures) Fuel economy mpg (l/100km)  
Transmission Maximum speed (mph) Accleration 0-60 mph (sec) Accleration 30-50 mph (4th gear) (sec) Urban Driving Extra-urban driving Combined figure CO2 emissions Emission limit
Manual 130 9.4 n/a 29.7 (9.5) 52.3 (5.4) 40.9 (6.9) 186 Euro 4

Dodge Caliber (model available, version not available in the US)

Urban Cycle35.8 mpg (7.9 l/100km)
Extra Urban Cycle55.4 mpg (5.1 I/100km)
Combined Cycle46.3 mpg (6.1 I/100km)
CO2 Emissions161 g/km

While each of these examples uses Imperial rather than US Gallons for fuel consumption, after conversion, (multiply by 80% for US gallons), these models are all significant improvements on US supplied similar capability cars.

National Leadership Challenges
The changes defined in this document require the highest level of buy-in and endorsement, and require explaining to the American people. As has been seen by the adoption of Hybrid cars, there is significant willingness from a cultural, environmental, and social perspective to adapt to the needed changes. It is the Presidents role to encourage the nation to accept the new reality, and develop as a nation to meet the challenges that the new reality brings. The future wealth and health of our nation is dependent on this leadership.

Click Here For PDF Version of Complete Article

Times Article Viewed: 7090
Published: 04-Dec-2006


blog comments powered by Disqus