GEM neighorhood electric vehicle | EV World Is Now Powered By Plug-In Conversions Corporation
PREMIUM LOGIN
ADVERTISE ON EV WORLD
Reach tens of thousands of key EV industry drivers: from designers to investors and, of course, customers. CLICK TO LEARN MORE

Also check out EV WORLD MARKETSPACE.
 

EV WORLD EXCLUSIVE ARTICLE
Black Tesla Roadster electric car
The object of our admiration, the lithium ion-powered Tesla Roadster is capable of 130 mpg, 250 miles range and 0-to-60 in 4 seconds. Price tag is $100,000 and the first 150 have already been spoken for.

Tesla's British Connection



By BBC Radio 4

BBC Radio's In Business features program devoted to Telsa Motors' electric car


Open Access Article Originally Published: September 22, 2006

BBC Radio 4 devoted an entire program on 21 September 2006 to an in-depth look at one of the most promising electric cars to come along in a decade.  Host Peter Day goes for a ride in the Tesla Roadster and talks to both Tesla and Lotus engineers and managers, including Tesla CEO Martin Eberhard, as well as auto industry analyst John Wormald.

The program is available from BBC Radio 4 In Business as a downloadable MP3 "podcast" file using this link.  We've also taken the liberty of archiving the program for research and historic reasons.

END STORY


Times Article Viewed: 6965
Next >>



Reader Comments

A valid email address and confirmation is required before your comment can be posted. Comments not confirmed within 24 hours are automatically deleted.

First Name Last Name
Email Address:

[Please check your spelling. Do NOT use double quotes.
Use <P> to separate paragraphs.]

TYPE THE ABOVE CODE WORD INTO THE FORM FIELD


21 comments so far...

25-Sep-2006
33734
  

Paul. . . I would suggest that having 6800 Li-ion cells in the car should make you more confident in the battery pack, not less confident. That's massive redundancy. If one cell fails. . . so what? If a dozen fail. . . How much will that reduce the car's performance or range? You won't even be able to tell. A few bad cells are perfectly acceptable. Furthermore, even if one cell were to catch fire they've made sure the fire won't spread and destroy the battery pack. The pack also has a liquid-cooling system to control temperatures and extend the life span of the cells. The battery pack is where Tesla have put a large portion of their engineering efforts -- so I feel pretty good about it.
Posted by: Tony Belding


25-Sep-2006
33757
   This is all very interesting banter as gas prices go up! What I want to know, is How and Where do I order one, by then all this battery hype. will be technological history and the initial price will be typical for any personal luxury sports transport.
Posted by: John Fidler

26-Sep-2006
33774
  

Tesla designers and engineers have gone to great lengths to ensure that not only is the Tesla Roadster safe to drive, but also when charging the performance electric car, at home or on the road. Their goal is to not only meet, but to surpass the rigorous standards of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, or FMVSS, as implemented by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

So next time you roll up behind a Hummer, or an Escalade, or any other gas-guzzling dinosaur lumbering towards its rendezvous with destiny....wave and smile as you pass 'em in style....It's time to say Good-bye, EV1. So long, GEM. Sayonara, honorable Prius. Make room for the new king of the road, the next big thing, the must have rocket car to the future! Nikola Tesla himself would weep with joy to have been honored by this sleek, sexy, powerfully hot, bitchin', SuperCar loaded with torque and state-of-the-art technology! We've seen the future and IT'S ELECTRIC, BABY!


Posted by: Dave Cutter

26-Sep-2006
33815
   BuckFush, Lol, i don't think so! There's quite a lot of skepticism about within the EV community about Tesla's battery pack. Also bear in the mind that there been a 100% track record of business failures of electric cars over the last 80 years. What Tesla is doing is so bold and new i'd be very surprised if there wasn't a lot of skepticism. Interstingly Tesla do a great blog and have answered many of the questions people ask about safety and calender life. That said I think they've got there PR work cut out for them on this - though if there present performance is anything to go by I've no doubt there up to the challenge.
Posted by: Nick Flynn

04-Oct-2006
34208
   Tesla is using three year old battery technology because of lengthy prototyping . The new proven technology is Li-ion polymer battery . It is extruded similar to a pizza dough machine and can easily be mass produced . They are also thin and flexible . Anyone can purchase these batteries from www.kokam.com and can be used externally with any laptop . All laptops run hot because of siamesing the battery pack next to internal components . These batteries are also explosion and fire proof when crushed or pierced . ACpropulsion.com is running these in their test vehicle as we blog . You can relax your battery fears today . Another technology that will revolutionize all auto industry is the new carbon kevlar fibreglass press forming instead of the traditional hand lay-up molding .It is many times stronger than steel and lighter than aluminium . MIT is developing a thin film (packing tape thin)carbon nanotube battery , virus grown and harmless to humans . Change to electric propulsion will be a huge paridym shift for the auto and oil industry . Lobbying politicians will battle EV makers all the way to the bank , but the genie is already out of the bottle .
Posted by: John Hurt

07-Oct-2006
34405
   The need for better batteries is universal, not just for EVs. When my EV lead-acid batteries get a little weak they go into my solar system where the requirements are less. My 2001 vehicle has a replacement starter, is going on its 3rd alternator, new water hoses, and fuel pump. The water pump took almost a full day to replace. My 25 year old EV conversion has a new charger, motor controller, dc to dc converter, and its fourth set of batteries. All labor easily done in less than half a day and simple enough for a non-mechanic to do. Solar charged!
Posted by: John Spradley

30-Sep-2006
34017
   Actually, that should be major electric car companies have had a 100% failure (or quitting) rate. Then again, so did all airplane makers until about 1903. Petroleum-dependent cars will have a 100% failure rate. However there are EV makers still around. Like AC Propulsion.

Although I have a lot of respect for the Tesla guys, I would not describe what they are doing as revolutionary, as a technology to build. They essentially took a project that ACP had been working on for many years, brought in more talent and capital and connections, manufacturing and marketing and are finishing the job. And they're doing it when the time is right. Battery technology is making the needed advances, and the public is finally catching on that petroleum is for losers and for the willing non-free--not Tesla's market. They're also a typical Silicon Valley start-up: do some state-of-the-art engineering to advance something, then farm out all the production to much more experienced and better-equipped contractors. It's almost hard to see how they can lose for technological reasons. They could get eclipsed, or pull a DeLorean, but I doubt it. I'd almost say you're more likely to get stranded buying a GM or Ford, because of their gashog commitments.

Tesla's ambition to then take it to the next level will be more challenging. They could easily get eclipsed. Let's wish them success.
Posted by: P L Schager


01-Oct-2006
34064
   This is a message to all you anti-battery people. I am writing to you on a three year old laptop. I use it almost every day. The batteries still work fine, they have never exploded. It doesn't burn my desk, and usually if a laptop is hot, I would suggest the cause is the CPU. Lithium ion batteries, in our PCs, have only been with us a short time now, not the ten years as the previous writer said. Clearly the makers are pushing the envelope, as in any new technology. There were an awful lot of accidents with fighter planes in WW2, because the technolgy was advancing so fast. As any technology matures its reliability increases and its cost falls. There is bound to be the odd problem with these amazing cars, but what a huge leap forward they are.
Posted by: Lawrence Watt

02-Oct-2006
34090
   Just a last comment on the Tesla Roadster. As many have said, and I agree, this new car merits the "wows" that it has received, as on the BBC Radio program. But it also deserves a little skepticism, which the BBC Radio program also includes. While this Roadster will be a big first step, people's expectations seem way too high. These cars will, I think, turn out to have some real problems. Start with problems caused by all that current flowing in and out of the 6,000 batteries every day. That just has not been done before, and it is not pessimistic to assume that something may well go wrong. While Tesla will have done its testing, the real world will give a much harder test. And the Tesla Roadster will end up, I predict, with barely a passing grade. We need to keep our expectations reasonable, or this may end up being the end of the road for Tesla rather than the beginning.
Posted by: Paul Peterson

02-Oct-2006
34097
   I'm editor of the BBC Radio 4 programme, IN BUSINESS, presented by Peter Day. I have received several queries asking (as a result of the discussions above) how to hear the programme again. Here is the correct link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/news/inbusiness/inbusiness_20060921.shtml Click on Listen to this Programme in Full, as the MP3 download stops a week after broadcast. Peter Day also presents GLOBAL BUSINESS, on BBC World Service Radio.
Posted by: Stephen Chilcott

02-Oct-2006
34140
   I've been watching these comments for years and I'm fascinated by how intelligent people salivate over all these pseudo intellectual forums - we had electric cars over a 100 years ago. I would be impressed if cars could fly - well they can, but "they" don't want you to know that - however, what I see is industry leaders playing with us, teasing us with incremental technological advancements so they can use up garbage, outdated components left on their shelf from a bygone era and maximize their profits. A corporation is only interested in profit - so why not lie about the technology to maximize the return? While everyone is practicing mental gymnastics - industry pondering their earnings while consumers await the latest bling-bling - the polar caps are melting and we are racing headfirst into another ice age. When the climate flips, we won't be worrying about fancy cars - we'll be scratching our heads trying to figure out how to grow food and not freeze to death (that's if the political apparatus we sit on doesn't eradicate us first with some farce about an outside enemy attacking us)
Posted by: wonder kid

24-Sep-2006
33638
   Don't get me wrong. I love the Tesla Roadster. And I admire Martin Eberhard and his team for getting this car to prototype stage so quickly (what was it, two or three years?) and for so little money (reported to be $25 million out of the $60 million invested). But there is a reason why the car costs $100,000. Their design is a very expensive way to go. Costs will not come down easily. I think they are dreaming to think that they will be coming out with a 4-seater sedan for anywhere under $100,000. And I cringe every time I think about the 6,000 lithium-ion battery cells in the car. I'm afraid that's a disaster waiting to happen. Not in terms of injuring people, although that may happen. But in terms of performance. I think these cars are going to be dying on the road, and complaints will start flying.
Posted by: paul peterson

24-Sep-2006
33650
  

The car is expensive because it contains a lot of Li-ion cells, because its bodywork is carbon-fiber composite, and because it will be assembled in small numbers by Lotus. A Lotus Elise also costs about twice as much as a Mazda Miata, doesn't it? So yes, I'm sure it's possible to manufacture an electric sports car at a lower cost, with some compromises -- but that simply wasn't Tesla's strategy for this car.

The planned four-door car will, I'm sure, be produced in larger volumes and benefit from cost reductions. Exactly how much it will benefit depends on decisions they make about its design, its performance, where it will be assembled, etc. Keep in mind the batteries in the Tesla Roadster cost the company probably around $20,000. Although that's a lot of money, it doesn't automatically require a four-door car to be sold for $100,000.

I would also point out that the Tesla Roadster is arguably rather a bargain compared to conventional gasoline-powered sports cars in its performance class -- particularly when you factor in their fuel consumption and requirement of premium gasoline, and their demanding maintenance schedules. With an electric car you need to think about spending more money up front but having a lower cost of ownership.

I really don't understand why anybody would "cringe" when thinking about the Li-ion battery pack. Tesla's engineers have done their homework on battery safety, and they are completely up-front about the expected life span of the battery pack. I can't imagine where you got this idea of "cars dying on the road". I've seen nothing yet to suggest that is likely to happen at all.
Posted by: Tony Belding


24-Sep-2006
33666
   Regarding the battery pack's longevity: the air conditioning will keep the batteries at the optimal temperature. Or as Tesla put it: they pamper their batteries. Also: Li-ion batteries don't just die: the capacity falls over time, reducing the available range. You won't drive 250km on a pack today, and get stuck after 200km next week.
Posted by: Raymond Michiels

24-Sep-2006
33671
  

Just to comment on the Tesla Roadster batteries. I'm not a battery expert. But I've worked with some people who are. They always told me that the reputation that batteries have for being fickle is well-deserved. They are trickly little buggers, and they never work like you expect them to.

For example, WaveCrest Labs had a devil of a time with the batteries for their TidalForce bicycles. As I understand it, they still do. People in the middle of a ride suddenly finding that their bike motor will no longer move. The problem always turned out to be the batteries.

And Tesla is using laptop batteries in its car. That's what makes me cringe. I bought an IBM Thinkpad in 2000 that has a three-cell Li-ion battery. I'm on my fourth one now. And it seems to need replacement. Not only have the batteries been short-lived and unreliable, the heat the battery generates when charging or discharging is surprising. It's definitely not usable on my lap -- it gets too hot.

That's three Li-ion cells. Tesla uses 6,000. I "cringe" because I think of all the problems you can have with that many cells. And the tremendous amount of power that needs to go in and out of those cells every day. And the stress testing that will be put on that battery system as the cars are used every day.

How long have we been using Li-ion cells in laptops? About ten years? You would think the technology would be mature by now. And still just last month I see on the news a clip of a laptop in flames because of a battery problem. And Sony's customers having to recall hundreds of thousands of Sony-made batteries, not just for the bursting into flames problem, but just recently because some could not hold a charge.

As I say, I love the Tesla Roadster. What a great little car. And I'm not a battery expert, so I cannot confidently predict a problem. Maybe Tesla has designed around any and all battery problems.

But I have been a lawyer in Silicon Valley for almost 30 years, working with a lot of new technologies. My gut tells me that in five years the Tesla Roadster is not going to be considered the gem of an electric car that we all hope it is. And I think batteries will be the thing to have put it in its grave, along with the Edsel and the EV-1.


Posted by: Paul Peterson


24-Sep-2006
33674
   I am an engineer. From my personal view the car is good. Anyway, how many of us drives more than 50km (30 miles) a day? Currently, in most country is illegal to drive over 110km/h(70mph). The car will be able to be cover extra long range if we drive sensibly. It is safer to drive at lower speed. Rushing to get to your destination will just increase the odds to meet Lucifer. Most accidents occur due to late for work.

Provided the goverment support the programme by building a recharging points at every car park, this car will defenitely have no more problem with range. We'll really feel the worthiness of paying parking fee. Didn't we pay council tax, road tax? Then why parking is not free?

Talking about exploding batteries. Well, how many of us own a laptop or mobile phone with Li-ion batteries? Have you actually encounter a mishap with exploding batteries? Batteries only explode due to abuse; short circuiting the batteries by intention or exposing them to extreme heat.

Fact: How many gasoline car have you seen/ heard exploding for no reason so far? I bet you hear those more than few dozen of times, radiator blasting or even caught on fire and explode.

IF THERE IS NO MORE OIL LEFT. I am sure that ALL automobile manufacturers and even governments will try to convince the public that Electric Car is better than Internal combustion engine cars, then we will see a very cheap EV on the roads.Of course G. Bush cs and his Arabs relatives will start to divert their family assets to EV too.
Posted by: An Engineer


24-Sep-2006
33677
   To Paul Petersen. I guess that's the problem with lawyer. Required to lie and twisting facts are their specialty or else they'll loose their job. If you are not the credible experts why make comments.

Anyway, since you are a lawyer,why not start sueing IBM for supplying low quality batteries that don't hold charge? In that way I will bow and salute your profession.

China do make a very low quality stuffs to a very high quality stuffs depending on the request from their customers. You pay peanut you get peanut.
Posted by: An Engineer


24-Sep-2006
33681
  

I'll not argue with An Engineer about lawyers. I hate them too. And although I've been a lawyer for decades, I've never set a foot inside a courtroom. Nor do I plan to. Before becoming a lawyer, I had a more honorable profession, and have a BS and MS in EE.

Even so, I do not speak from a battery expert's viewpoint when I worry about the Tesla Roadster's practicality. But I do worry. We are heaping praise on a car that looks good on paper. But it hasn't earned that praise. And I don't think it will.

Not that I mean to criticize. I admire the Tesla people and investors for their courage. But what if the Tesla Roadster has its problems? One of the reporters at the big Tesla event at the Long Beach airport said that the Roadster prototype he was being given a ride in became motionless out on the runway. Someone had to be called by radio to come out and fix it, which they did. What about when that happens on the real road to George Clooney next year? Is that going to get people on the electric vehicle bandwagon?

Maybe I'm being a worrywart, and everything will turn out fine. But I still worry. If something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. Battery technology defeated even Thomas Edison. Could it defeat Tesla too?
Posted by: Paul Peterson


24-Sep-2006
33685
   Paul,

I'm no battery expert either. My guestimate is that your possibly right but probably wrong. My experience of batteries comes from building electric bikes and sharing information with others doing the same. Overall my own experience has been very postive and the times when it hasn't has more often than not been due to my own ignorance. Yes batteries can be tricky but if used within the right parameters can be very reliable. They also make a very useful scapegoat for other problems.

For example a car starter battery can last for 5 years, but if bad connections put a small drain on the battery it may die much sooner. Its quite complicated to check for these. Most mechanics i've known just blame and replace the battery.

Laptops are anothter good example. lithium battery life is sensitive to high temperature. Its possible to design a cooling system that will keep the temperature of the whole laptop very low, but at what weight and cost penalty? Perhaps better to sideline these issue's afterall consumers will just blame those fenickity batteries.

As a side note your laptop battery shouldn't be getting hot on either charge (li-ion charging is endothermic) or discharge. You might have some other problem there. The sony li-ion recall is perhaps another good example. I'm don't know technical story of what happened but its a safe bet to assume that sony and dell were under pretty strong commercial pressure to increase the battery runtimes and reduce costs. Constant reformulations of the chemistry to squeese out those extra few minutes and boost those all important specs. lithium is pretty reactive stuff, and maybe they just took there eye off the ball. Not such a big deal, after all consumers will just blame those wild fiery lithium batteries.

I've got a good feeling about Tesla. Partly because one of the founders was a battery engineer. But also because unlike the EV-1, politics hasn't got anything to with it
Posted by: Nick Flynn


24-Sep-2006
33702
  

Nick,

You may well be right that the Tesla Roadster will turn out to shine. I did not know that one of Tesla's founders was a battery engineer. I did know that Tesla spent a lot of time -- Martin Eberhard said in his intervies on this BBC Radio program that it was 40% of the engineering time -- on the batteries. And your point about company politics is right on. Unlike GM, Tesla did that right. They have had, and still have, a clear vision that they all follow, with no one in the company trying to sabotage the effort.

Like you have a good feeling, though, I have to admit that my gut feeling is bad. Who was it, Hans Solo in Star Wars that used to say, "I've got a bad feeling about this"? I think Tesla is another Webvan in the making. At the same time, I applaud the effort of the Tesla team and hope for their success.

And I have to say that this BBC Radio program was excellent. It struck a thoughtful balance between optimism and skepticism. Well worth the time to listen.
Posted by: Paul Peterson


25-Sep-2006
33716
   The real reason for the Sony battery problems is explained here: http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060815/dell_battery_recall.html?.v=2
'During the manufacturing process at a Sony factory in Japan, crimping the rolls left tiny shards of metal loose in the cells, and some of those shards caused batteries to short-circuit and overheat, according to Sony.'
I'm not sure why these explanation is not told more often, instead there is a lot of fearmongering about lithium batteries in general, and hysteric fairy-tales about exploding laptops are repeated over and over again by clueless dorks.
Conspiracy theory, anyone? Just FYI: Not just ANY kind of battery, even your 110V or 230V outlet will behave unfriendly (to say the least) if it is shorted with pieces of metal!

And laptop batteries don't live long because they get too much heat from the laptop itself (processor, graphic card, ...).
I've had a Nokia cell phone from my company for five years and the lithium battery showed no noticeable loss of capacity in this time.

Regards, Skarrin
Posted by: Jens Schacherl



TOOLS

printer email RSS

Miles Kilometers  
MPG L/100km  
 

[More Metric Converters]



CLICK TO PLAY MP3 AUDIO



Sign Up for FREE Weekly Email

Join the Dialogue

Here are the latest discussion threads on EV World's [Legacy] Forum

Seymour Powell AIRCRUISE Envisions Solar, Hydrogen-powered Airship Hotel
Posted: 04 Feb 2010
President Obama on China's Wind Power Campaign
Posted: 04 Feb 2010
VIDEO: Why Investors Are Backing Better Place
Posted: 26 Jan 2010
Earth: Our Speck in the Universe
Posted: 22 Jan 2010
Peak Oil By 2020: Toyota's Official View
Posted: 22 Jan 2010