GEM neighorhood electric vehicle | EV World Is Now Powered By Plug-In Conversions Corporation
PREMIUM LOGIN
ADVERTISE ON EV WORLD
Reach tens of thousands of key EV industry drivers: from designers to investors and, of course, customers. CLICK TO LEARN MORE

Also check out EV WORLD MARKETSPACE.
 

EV WORLD EXCLUSIVE ARTICLE
FIA's Max Mosley
FIA president Max Moseley has been called many things over the years -- often uncomplimentary -- but now we might add the term 'visionary' for his decision to 'green' Formula One racing by allowing the use of hybrid-electric and other energy storage technologies into racing starting in 2009. One such technology is HyKinesys' Power Beam kinetic energy system, which may have wide commercial application outside of F1 racing.

Formula One Is Going Green



By Chris Ellis

Report from EV World's UK motor racing correspondent


Open Access Article Originally Published: June 12, 2006

Just before the British Grand Prix last week, the FIA (the governing body of world motor sport) declared its intention to drag Formula One into the 21st century.

The full transcript of the press conference is available at the Formula1.com web site. Fans of motor racing will want to analyze every sentence, but it's the announcement's impact on road cars which should excite everyone who is concerned about fuel prices and global warming. The central message is that the most technically advanced and heavily-funded form of motor sport will now be obliged to focus on fuel economy, one of the key issues that concern ordinary drivers. Consequently, Formula One will become relevant and useful again, rather than just an advanced form of horse racing.

The President of the FIA, Max Moseley, gave a stark warning to the auto makers (BMW, DaimlerChrysler, Fiat, Honda, Renault/Nissan, Toyota, etc) who control most of the Formula One teams. He claimed that they were spending hundreds of millions of dollars every year just trying to get a few more rpm out of their racing engines. This was unsustainable, and wasted superb engineering resources on an ultimately futile objective. Formula One should be the proving ground for advanced automotive technology, but it has fallen behind in areas such as fuel consumption. In the mid-90s at least two teams experimented with hybrid systems, but the FIA stopped them because it was concerned about safety. Since then, battery-based hybrid drives have been successfully launched in road cars. The FIA has now decided to allow (petrol-only) hybrids from the beginning of 2009, subject to final approval at the end of this year.

The FIA is placing only two major constraints on the technology used. The first, which is paramount, is safety. The second is a weight limit of 20 kilograms (44 lbs) for the complete 'surge power unit'. For example, if ultra-capacitors are used, the motor and controller/inverter must be included within the 20 kg weight budget. The technology is otherwise 'free'. Among the obvious alternatives are hydraulic systems and kinetic energy storage systems (quaintly referred to as 'inertia systems' by the FIA). While 20 kilograms would be a prohibitive limitation using conventional materials in a 1.5 ton road car, the minimum weight of a Formula One car, including the driver, will have fallen to only 550 kilograms (1213 lbs) by 2008. In addition, key components have much shorter target 'lives', say ten hours versus five thousand, and much higher component stresses are allowed in racing. Consequently, the FIA estimates that the early systems will be capable of delivering some 60 bhp of additional power for as much as nine seconds, with peak power doubling over several years of further development. The FIA quotes the initial energy storage capacity it anticipates as 400 kilojoules, which translates to some 110 Watt hours.

Let's put that probable 60 bhp of power boost into perspective. The hybrid drive in the Toyota Prius adds only some 34 bhp to the 76 bhp engine of a vehicle which weighs three times as much with a couple of passengers. The FIA's 'entertainment objective' of introducing more overtaking is clearly going to be a racing certainty.

On engines, the FIA game plan distills to the following, assuming no significant changes. From now through to the end of 2010, the cars will run with homologated (i.e. 'frozen') engine designs, essentially the current engines. These are 2.4 liter V8s, producing almost 800 bhp. Despite the light weight of the current cars, they usually get only 4 miles per gallon on a typical track. The fuel consumption is so high because the cars repeatedly surge up to 180 mph or more and then brake heavily, many times in each lap of a typical circuit, throwing away the kinetic energy of the car as heat from the brakes every time they do it. In addition, the cars' coefficients of drag are almost twice those of sleek road cars, as a result of the massive downforce generated by their wings, and open wheels, etc. One might think of Formula One as an attempt to run the EPA's city cycle at insane speeds in cars that have the aerodynamic drag of an SUV! Unlike NASCAR and the IRL, where speeds remain very high and there is little merit in regenerative braking, Formula One cries out for it, and is about to get it. Because some Formula One races are run on public roads (such as Monaco) and all the other tracks have many road-like turns, the capabilities demanded of Formula One cars are much more 'realistic' than those needed for banked ovals. Consequently, there is genuine potential for race-bred Formula One technology to find its way, eventually, into road cars. This certainly should be true of hybrid technology. A $20,000 unit that can add 200 bhp to a $100,000 sports car and double its mpg in the city is likely to have a market.

The FIA is determined to whittle away at downforce, which implies reducing drag, but would like to prevent top speeds rising. Consequently, the FIA is going to have to cut engine power beyond 2010, particularly as power levels build up from the surge power units. Here's the deal the FIA is putting to the participating auto makers. Together, agree a new engine formula, with only two constraints. First any new engine must still sound and feel like a racing engine. Second, and I quote directly because it's critical - 'any research to improve that racing engine would have to be directly relevant to research to improve fuel efficiency in road cars'. That changes the whole ball game.

Amongst the other pearls that emerged during the press conference, Moseley indicated that "we'd be quite happy" with an energy storage device connected to the front wheels. This would effectively turn the car into a four-wheel-drive vehicle, and give it better traction off the line and out of corners. This competitive advantage probably means all the teams will want it, once it's proved to work. Ditto road hybrids? Another interesting move is that the fuel used in Formula One must have a biofuel content in excess of 5.75% from the start of the the season after next.

Standing further back, consider this. Almost any mechanical engineer (and most others!) on the planet would jump at the chance of joining a Formula One team. It's the most competitive and prestigious engineering activity of all, beating aerospace and computing hands down. Now the FIA has told these engineers to stop playing around and to concentrate on doing something useful, which is precisely what most engineers prefer doing. The Directors of R&D in the major auto companies are going to realize, once they've recovered from the shock, that they now have the awesome talents of their racing divisions aimed at one of their key corporate objectives. The clever ones will insist that Racing is still paid for by Marketing, but will also make sure that technology transfer is pursued aggressively. The pace of hybrid development will then accelerate as only a race car can.

GO TO NEXT PAGE >>


Times Article Viewed: 15400
Next >>



Reader Comments

A valid email address and confirmation is required before your comment can be posted. Comments not confirmed within 24 hours are automatically deleted.

First Name Last Name
Email Address:

[Please check your spelling. Do NOT use double quotes.
Use <P> to separate paragraphs.]

TYPE THE ABOVE CODE WORD INTO THE FORM FIELD


10 comments so far...

19-Jul-2007
57234
   When are we going to get gas turbine/ energy store hybrids using oil from algae as fuel? Now that would be even more of a challenge for the engineers.
Posted by: Shane Wilson

03-Nov-2008
64737
   I am all in favour of energy efficiency , but global warming a major threat? Leave it out. Seen the weather for the last few years? We're back into cooling I'm afraid. Stick to the technology and leave the politics to the politicians. Peak oil? You should check out the discoveries in the South Atlantic. Massive reserves will come onstream there in the not too distant future and if the US allowed offshore drilling, even more reserves are there, plus the massive oil shale reserves in North America.
Posted by: John Harbinger

16-Oct-2006
34846
   I'm disappointed these cars are still going to SOUND like the old versions..isn't it time this noise pollution was sorted out ?... I'm a big F1 fan but i cringe at the noise WE force onto others who don't follow our interests - I had hoped that when motor racing finally left the 1970's behind they would leave the obsession with noise behind also
Posted by: brian smith

07-Jan-2009
65444
  

I am trying hard to put together an all electric grand prix in Portland Or 2009. What are your thought son this idea? I am working hard to find teams and as far as I can see there are 4-6 cars built and so I think it might be possible. I hope to attract the attention of larger teams and sponsors. I know this undertaking is going to be all up hill this first time around but after the momentum gets going...?

 PDXGP 2009 If you have any input or suggestions I am hopeful you will share them with me.

Thanks for thinking ahead. I think the racing can only get better with EVs, being born on the track practically  ( my father a Nascar racer and my mother the trophy girl ) I feel as though it is the most natural next step.

Thank you


Posted by: Scot Allison

15-Jun-2006
25507
   Johann,

Thanks for the compliment. Assuming the new regulation is approved this December, the new energy storage devices have to ready for serious in-car testing by the winter of 2008, say 21 months from blank screen to fully functional. That is 'challenging', even by F1 standards. I am sure you'll have plenty of enjoyment in the interim, following the intensifying speculation as to what will eventually pop out of the various boxes!

Duncan,

Please read www.the-mia.com/filelibrary/EfficientRacing.pdf
Posted by: Chris Ellis


15-Jun-2006
25532
   This news is easily as encouraging as Audi's adoption of diesel propulsion for endurance racing.

Sorry to hear Max is retiring. I hope his successor is more like him and not another Bernie E.

Great reporting, Chris!
Posted by: Warren Joeckel


16-Jun-2006
25557
   Hi Chris, Thanks for the link. I'm not sure if this is the right forum but I disagree with your premise, I would like to reduce downforce to increase braking zones and eliminate the effects of dirty air. Colin was right to say keep it simple, I would suggest, safety rules, fuel amount and type, no wings, oval body section, minimum ground clearance (plank or something) The racing would only have a low power to weight ratio if you allowed too little fuel Part of the overtaking would be because you could end up with an engine that could produce much more power BUT only for a short period or you run out of fuel The hybrid option would be worth while if it gave a weight effective advantage
Posted by: Duncan Cairncross

16-Jun-2006
25586
  

Duncan,

The key objective of ACTIVE downforce is to cut the braking distances of ROAD vehicles. 'Efficient Racing' was written 3 years ago when I thought F1 was becoming stuck in a time warp. I am quite content now to forget active downforce for the track and introduce it on top-end road cars, where the added complexity will not be high if the vehicle is already a powerful hybrid. Once upon a time, Jaguars had a small red warning triangle on their rear bumpers with 'Disc Brakes' on them.

Watch out for the new warning triangle!
Posted by: Chris Ellis


12-Jun-2006
25132
   Great article Chris. I'm really looking forward to Formula 1 progress now! 2009 seems too far away for me. But I'll be patient.

One more point is that this will show folks that hybrids can be fast and powerful and that it's cool to be efficient and clean. Hopefully this mentality will then trickle to electric vehicles.
Posted by: Johann Joseph


13-Jun-2006
25175
   Great idea, But I would have thought the best to increase efficiency XXXX to Improve the breed XXXX would be to restrict the fuel used. Just like the way it was a few years ago, lots of excessive power to overtake but if it is used too much you run out of fuel Each season you allow less fuel! May the most efficient car win! possibly with a hybrid thingy on the front wheels
Posted by: Duncan Cairncross


TOOLS

printer email RSS

Miles Kilometers  
MPG L/100km  
 

[More Metric Converters]






Sign Up for FREE Weekly Email

Join the Dialogue

Here are the latest discussion threads on EV World's [Legacy] Forum

Seymour Powell AIRCRUISE Envisions Solar, Hydrogen-powered Airship Hotel
Posted: 04 Feb 2010
President Obama on China's Wind Power Campaign
Posted: 04 Feb 2010
VIDEO: Why Investors Are Backing Better Place
Posted: 26 Jan 2010
Earth: Our Speck in the Universe
Posted: 22 Jan 2010
Peak Oil By 2020: Toyota's Official View
Posted: 22 Jan 2010